What's the first thing you need to know about reading food labels? Too often, people with the best of intentions don't realize that unless you read the entire label, you're not going to get a true idea of the food's ingredients. Even then, you have to know how to interpret what the label says to be absolutely certain that you're getting what you want.
"When it comes to processed foods, if it says it's natural, ignore the claim," says Organic Lifestyle Magazine. "It means nothing. If it says it's organic, it doesn't have to be 100 percent organic unless it says it is. Remember processed foods can be labeled organic if only 80 percent of the ingredients are organic. And organic junk food is still junk food."
The best advice is to simply not eat any processed foods at all. But if you must, a short list of ingredients and phrases to avoid includes artificial colors, artificial flavorings, artificial sweeteners, high fructose corn syrup, sodium nitrates or nitrites, and others.
Most of what's on the label is marketing hype and splashy design work, made only to seduce you into believing the product is good for you. And as you'll see, you have to be very market-savvy to find the truth, because labels have fooled even the smartest shoppers.
It's easy to be duped, if you don't know what to look for.
In 2006, a survey was taken on more than 1,000 adults. The results might surprise you:
There is obviously quite a bit of denial operating in the collective American psyche!
You might be surprised to learn that the FDA does not require foods to be laboratory tested for nutritional content. While the FDA does check food labels, they only check to see whether or not the Nutrition Facts panel is present—not whether or not it's accurate.
The labeling law allows food companies to simply estimate average values for fat, protein, carbohydrates, sugar, etc., for any given product, based on a standard list of ingredients.
So, how accurate do they have to be to avoid violating labeling laws?
The FDA says a 20 percent margin of error is acceptable. Even getting 20 percent more fat or sugar than you want will really add up over time. But the truth is, it's much worse than that.
According to a BBC News article, food testers from Which? magazine analyzed 570 nutrients listed on 70 products. Only 7 percent matched what the label said—levels of fat, salt, calories and carbs were inaccurate in 93 percent of products tested.
The results were surprising:
A 2008 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that about 24 percent of food labels were inaccurate. Also in 2008, Good Morning America hired a lab to test a dozen packaged food products to see if the nutrients matched the labels, and all 12 products exceeded what was claimed on the label, in one way or another (primarily fat, sugar and sodium).
Manufacturers get away with this because punishment for violations is a joke.
For a first offense, information about the food is entered into a database, but the product is still allowed on store shelves. If a second violation is detected within 60 days, then the product may be suspended. But here's the catch: since food testing is very infrequent, it is highly unlikely that a second offense will be caught within their 60-day time frame.
This effectively allows food manufacturers to do whatever they want and slant their claims however they wish, based on the demographic they want to manipulate.
The marketing of children's foods is a perfect example.
Prevention Institute investigated package labeling for children's foods in 2010. They found 84 percent of products advertised as "healthiest picks for kids" did not meet even basic nutritional standards.
And the next time you see ""zero trans fats" on a label, don't believe it. Manufacturers are allowed to use that phrase as long as the product contains less than 0.5 grams per serving. Look at the ingredient list and see if it contains some hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils.
Statements like those are unregulated and are designed to appeal to the gullible health-conscious, but do not reflect nutritional content. Marketers hope you're uninformed enough to accept those statements at face value—hoping you'll just grab the bag and go.
Even phrases like "all organic" have little meaning without the official USDA Organic seal, which is your best assurance of quality.
Growers and manufacturers of organic products bearing the USDA seal have to meet the strictest standards of any of the currently available organic labels, in terms of being free of antibiotics and growth hormones, pesticides, heavy metals, preservatives, chemicals, irradiation, etc.
That said, even the USDA Organic seal has been greatly compromised over the past several years.
Organic foods were once truly raised naturally, on small farms with great integrity. But with the skyrocketing popularity of the organic food industry, big business has now stepped in and tainted many of the principles upon which the organic label was founded.
Wal-Mart, for instance, is now the largest organic retailer in the United States. According to the Organic Consumers Association, the mega-store is:
The sad fact is, you are being ripped off by much of the organic food you are buying.
For example, consider all of those "organic" junk foods like ice cream, crackers, cookies, pizzas and potato chips. A potato chip is one of the worst foods you can eat, regardless of whether or not the potato is organic.
Yet big business is cashing in on your desire to "have your cake and eat it too" by trying to make you believe you can eat cake, cookies, ice cream and potato chips without feeling guilty—because they're "organic."
The same deception is beginning to happen with the word "local." How local is local?
"Local" is yet another unregulated term that clever marketers are using to increase sales. Without visiting the farm, it's hard to know what "local" really is.
Some states actually regulate geographic claims, but many do not. For example, in Vermont, a product labeled as "local" must originate within 30 miles of where it is sold. And in California, farmers selling produce through California Farmers' Markets must grow the produce within the state of California, which could be 5 miles away or 400.
And realize that neither "organic" nor "local" reveals anything about the size, sustainability, or humaneness of the farm.
"...The Secretary of the Food and Drug Administration shall not approve for use in food any chemical additive found to induce cancer in man, or, after tests, found to induce cancer in animals."
One of the problems is, additives that were "GRAS" (generally regarded as safe) prior to this amendment were "grandfathered in"—and some of them are now known to be carcinogenic.
The following are a few examples of food additives to watch out for in your ingredient list: